Last year I looked at which devices are used to visit this site. Now I have looked up the data for the past year. As expected, phones have now become the most common device used by visitors to this site.
An oxymoron is a contradiction in terms, and the one about nutrients being present but not available, or exchangeable but not available, or adequate but limited, is one I hear again and again.
Paul Walsh recently posed this common question:
I've tried previously to answer this in a lot of different ways:
- Concerning the availability of nutrients in soil
- It's not really about extractable or available
- Beware! These topics are misleading and irrelevant
- Seminar questions: availability (again), and foliar applications in the context of soil guidelines
- Bah! Humbug! "Exchangeable" vs. "Aavailable" is a fallacy
- Another availability question: P & K & MLSN
- Why it is not important to maintain soil pH between 6.5 and 7.0
Let me answer in a slightly different way this time.
First, it's an oxymoron to think of availability in terms of present but not available, or adequate but of limited availability. A clearer way to think of this, and the way that I try to express it now, is enough or not enough. For any element, is there enough to meet the grass requirements, or is there not enough? The MLSN guidelines provide an answer to this question.
Second, have you noticed what is missing in all this discussion about the semantics of availability? Turf performance. That's what is missing. I want to know if there is enough, or not enough, in order to produced the desired turfgrass surface. Sure, the solubility of different elements changes with pH. Sure, the ion exchange characteristics of the soil change with pH. But only when turfgrass performance is affected do we need to worry about this. So I suggest going back to the first point: is there enough or not enough?
Here is grass performing just fine across a range of pH from 3.7 to 9.5. Yes, the soil chemistry changes across that pH range. Yes, there will be differences in nutrient solubility. But the grass is fine. You'll see that there is enough in each of these soils.
Soil pH from 3.7 to 7.4
Soil pH 6.5
Soil pH 7.8
Soil pH 8.3
Soil pH 9.5
Plotting the normal temperatures and sunshine hours for a location places that location in a particular 2-dimensional space. I demonstrated that in these charts. @turfstuf suggested that a diagonal line might show a break point for classifying warm and cool-season grasses.
@asianturfgrass Looks like a blurry line drawn from 14h to 35C might show an over/under for some warm/cool grasses & growing seasons.— turfstuf (@turfstuf) April 16, 2016
The idea is that the top right would be warm-season, the area around the line would be transition zone, and the area to the bottom left would be cool season. That chart looks like this.
I agree that different regions of the chart are indicative of over/under points for different grasses or growing conditions. I wouldn't separate by that diagonal line. Here's the break points I would use.
- mean annual temperature less than 15°C, cool-season
- mean annual temperature from 15 to 20°C, transition zone
- mean annual temperature above 20°, warm-season
For those general breaks, one can estimate the annual mean from the monthly charts, or plot the locations by the mean annual temperature.
Continuing with the breaks, specifically looking at which warm-season grasses will be suitable:
- within warm-season, and more than 6 hours sunshine per day, bermudagrass
- within warm-season, and less than 6 hours sunshine per day, zoysiagrass or other warm season grasses that are tolerant of low light conditions: bermudagrass will struggle
- within transition zone, and less than 6 hours sunshine per day, if warm-season grasses are used, zoysiagrass or other warm season grasses that are tolerant of low light conditions: bermudagrass will struggle
A transition zone location like Atlanta looks like this when those points are marked on the plot.
Two warm-season locations, one where bermuda thrives (Honolulu) and another where bermuda is overgrown by more shade tolerant grasses (Hilo), are shown here.
In the next plots I show some other locations: cool-season, warm-season, and transition zone. The break points I use seem to agree pretty well with grass distribution and performance around the world.
Of the factors that influence plant growth, turfgrass managers are able to modify in some way the plant water status and the nitrogen supply to the grass, but they can do little to adjust the temperature and the light. As a consequence, both the grass adaptation to a particular environment, and the management requirements for the grass, will be influenced or controlled by the combination of light and temperature.
I spoke about this at a conference in 2012 and shared this handout. From the start of the handout:
The weather, and specifically the temperature and the amount of sunshine, has a major influence on the growth of grass and therefore on the suitability of certain grasses for certain climates. By plotting the climatological normal weather data with temperature on the horizontal axis (x-axis) and sunshine hours on the vertical axis (y-axis), we can see which locations are similar in these parameters, and thus likely to be suitable for the same grasses, and to similar maintenance practices for grasses. Many locations in East, South, and Southeast Asia are distinguished by relatively low sunshine duration as compared with locations of similar temperature in North America, Oceania, Africa, and Europe. For additional information about the use of these charts, see www.climate.asianturfgrass.com.
The idea is that when temperature and sunshine are the same (or similar) at two or more locations, the growing conditions, and the energy available for grass growth, are the same (or similar). When the temperature and sunshine are different, with no overlap, then the growing conditions are clearly different.
I think this is interesting and informative because such an approach can help to identify places that we might think are similar, but are in fact different, and vice versa. The implications for maintenance requirements, grass selection, and location to location comparisons are also evident from such representations of climate data. I've made some more plots to illustrate this.
I start with Miami. The normal monthly mean temperature is shown on the x-axis and the mean daily sunshine hours for that month are shown on the y-axis. The polygon defined by each of the 12 months of the year expresses what the normal growing environment is like at Miami. Places that are similar to Miami should have overlap in light and temperature with Miami. Places that are different should have little or no overlap.
Moscow, for example, has no overlap with Miami. I don't think anyone would expect it to.
The hottest months of the year at Moscow are cooler (with more sunshine) than the coldest months at Miami. There is no overlap between these locations.
New York City has some overlap with both Miami and Moscow. If I plot New York on this chart, I can see which months at New York are similar to Miami or Moscow.
June in New York is similar in temperature and sunshine to March in Miami, September in New York is almost the same as January in Miami, and July and August in New York are between March and October conditions in Miami. One can also see the seasonal overlap between New York and Moscow conditions.
How about another warm season location like Miami? This plot adds Singapore conditions.
There is no overlap between Singapore and Miami, even though both are warm-season locations. There is more overlap between New York and Miami (about 3 months) than there is between Singapore and Miami (0 months). This has implications for grass selection and management. That is, the grasses the work in Singapore may not do very well in Miami, and vice versa.
Some places are predictably similar. Portland, and Seattle, for example, have almost complete overlap.
Other locations that one might expect to be similar have no overlap at all. I often use Honolulu and Hilo as an example. And sure enough, one finds different grass species growing at these two locations.
This video discusses Hilo and Honolulu.
One can also look at transition zone locations, like Atlanta, where both warm and cool-season grasses are grown.
Melbourne is another transition zone location, with golf course fairways and sports fields usually planted to warm-season grasses, and golf course putting greens usually planted to cool-season grasses.
Here's a roundup of turfgrass articles and links from the past month:
Handout and slides, Beijing and Bangkok, playability and sustainability.
Weed ID tool with lots of photos.
Video report from the R&A sustainability seminar.
Jason Haines with these presentation slides on 4 years of MLSN.
Driving range before and after:
Dave Wilber and Jason Haines had a fascinating conversation.
5 things I don't do anymore, and why, also by Jason Haines.
Maximum photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in summer.
A rule of thumb for the cloud effect on PAR.
Presentation slides and animated PAR charts for every day of the year.
Optimum playing conditions with minimum inputs.
This new book: A Short Grammar of Greenkeeping.
Three years of potassium and more snow mold.
Soil tests should result in less fertilizer application, not more.
For more about turfgrass management, browse articles available for download on the ATC Turfgrass Information page, subscribe to this blog by e-mail or with an RSS reader - I use Feedly, or follow asianturfgrass on Twitter. Link and article roundups from previous months are here.